| Status: | |
| Datum: | 23 MEI 1978 |
| Tijd: | 18:51 |
| Type: | Tupolev 144D |
| Luchtvaartmaatschappij: | Tupolev Design Bureau |
| Registratie: | CCCP-77111 |
| Constructienummer: | 10062 |
| Bouwjaar: | 1978-04-27 () |
| Aantal vlieguren: | 9 |
| Aantal vluchten: | 5 |
| Bemanning: | slachtoffers: 2 / inzittenden: 8 |
| Passagiers: | slachtoffers: 0 / inzittenden: 0 |
| Totaal: | slachtoffers: 2 / inzittenden: 8 |
| Schade: | Afgeschreven |
| Gevolgen: | Written off (damaged beyond repair) |
| Plaats: | Yegoryevsk (Rusland)
 |
| Fase: | Kruisvlucht (ENR) |
| Soort vlucht: | Test |
| Vliegveld van vertrek: | Khabarovsk-Novy Airport (KHV/UHHH), Rusland |
| Vliegveld van aankomst: | Khabarovsk-Novy Airport (KHV/UHHH), Rusland |
Beschrijving:The Tupolev 144 supersonic passenger jet was to make a test flight before delivery to Aeroflot. At an altitude of 3000 m a fire started at the APU, located in the right delta-shaped wing. A turn was made to return to the airport and the both engines located in the right wing (engines no. 3 and 4) were shut down. The plane began to lose height. Fire trailed the plane and the cockpit filled with smoke. Then one of the remaining two engines failed. The crew managed to belly land the plane in a field, six minutes from the moment of the beginning of the fire. On impact the nose cone collapsed under the fuselage, penetrating the compartment in which two flight engineers were seated.
It appeared that 27 minutes prior to the ignition, a fuel line ruptured, causing eight tons of fuel to leak, entering several compartments of the right wing. The fuel readings were judged incorrect by the flight engineers and where thus not reported to the commander.
Bronnen:
» Soviet Transports
» Dmitriy Yertsov
Foto's
Kaart
Deze kaart geeft het vliegveld van vetrek weer en de geplande bestemming van de vlucht. De lijn tussen de vliegvelden geeft
niet de exacte vliegroute weer.
De afstand tussen Khabarovsk-Novy Airport en Khabarovsk-Novy Airport bedraagt NAN km (NAN miles).
This information is not presented as the Flight Safety Foundation or the Aviation Safety Network’s opinion as to the cause of the accident. It is preliminary and is based on the facts as they are known at this time.