ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 188498
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.
| Date: | Saturday 19 June 1999 |
| Time: | 10:50 UTC |
| Type: |  Airbus A320-231 |
| Owner/operator: | Cyprus Airways |
| Registration: | 5B-DBC |
| MSN: | 295 |
| Year of manufacture: | 1992 |
| Engine model: | IAEV2500-A1 |
| Fatalities: | Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 181 |
| Aircraft damage: | Substantial |
| Category: | Accident |
| Location: | London Gatwick Airport (LGW/EGKK) -
 United Kingdom
|
| Phase: | Pushback / towing |
| Nature: | Passenger - Scheduled |
| Departure airport: | London Gatwick Airport (LGW/EGKK) |
| Larnaca International Airport (LCA/LCLK) | |
| Investigating agency: | AAIB |
| Confidence Rating: |  Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
Sustained substantial damage to Right elevator and stabiliser, whilst taxying for take off. According to the following excerpt from the official AAIB report into the accident:
"The aircraft, with all the passengers on board, was ready to leave Stand 12 at London Gatwick Airport. Pushback was requested on the ground frequency and clearance was given, with the added instruction that the aircraft should be pushed "right back to the blast fence." This instruction was passed on to the headset man on the ground, who indicated that he was familiar with the requirement, and the pushback began. The headset man, who was responsible for ensuring the area was clear, was monitoring the pushback but his attention was also on another aircraft positioning onto Stand 12 behind him.
The tug driver had recently completed training and, a few days prior to the incident, had been released to operate without supervision. At the end of the pushback the flight crew felt a slight jolt and asked the headset man the reason for this. He replied "that's nothing" and so they instructed him to disconnect the tug from the aircraft.
Neither the driver nor the headset man was aware of any contact with the blast fence. Meanwhile another airport staff member had seen the tail of the aircraft hit the blast fence and went over and alerted the headset man. He called the flight crew back and informed them that the aircraft had hit the blast fence and that the engines should be shut down.
This was done and the flight crew requested assistance from the emergency services. On arrival they advised that the damage was confined to the right elevator and stabiliser and there was no risk of fire.
The right elevator and stabiliser had impacted the angled end of the blast fence causing substantial damage to the aircraft. The aircraft had come to a halt with the nosewheel and fuselage displaced 5.5 metres to the north of the taxiway centreline. If the marked taxiway centreline had been maintained during or on completion of the push back, the aircraft would have remained clear of the blast fence."
Accident investigation:
 |
|
Sources:
1. AAIB: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/542303e2e5274a1317000c57/dft_avsafety_pdf_501963.pdf
2. http://www.airfleets.net/ficheapp/plane-a320-295.htm
Media:
Airbus A320-231 5B-DSC of Cyprus Airways at Amsterdam Schiphol (EHAM) on 26-12-2007:
.jpg)
Revision history:
| Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
|---|---|---|
| 03-Jul-2016 16:26 | Dr.John Smith | Added |
| 03-Jul-2016 16:26 | Dr.John Smith | Updated [Phase] |
| 01-Jul-2017 14:54 | Aerossurance | Updated [Time, Location, Destination airport, Narrative] |
Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description
The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:
| ASN Home | Send Correction / Feedback |
| FSF Home | Disclaimer | Copyright |
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy |
| Press / Media |
CONNECT WITH US:
©2024 Flight Safety Foundation