Last updated: 6 May 2021
| Statuts: | Enquête Officielle |
| Date: | samedi 4 janvier 2003 |
| Heure: | 17:35 |
| Type/Sous-type: |  Cessna 525 CitationJet |
| Compagnie: | JS Táxi Aéreo |
| Immatriculation: | PT-XJS |
| Numéro de série: | 525-0239 |
| Année de Fabrication: | 1998 |
| Heures de vol: | 1321 |
| Moteurs: | 2 Williams International FJ44-1A |
| Equipage: | victimes: 0 / à bord: 2 |
| Passagers: | victimes: 0 / à bord: 2 |
| Total: | victimes: 0 / à bord: 4 |
| Dégats de l'appareil: | Substantiels |
| Conséquences: | Repaired |
| Lieu de l'accident: | São Paulo-Congonhas Airport, SP (CGH) ( Brésil)
|
| Phase de vol: | A l'atterrissage (LDG) |
| Nature: | Affaires |
| Aéroport de départ: | Morrinhos Airport, GO (SWMX), Brésil |
| São Paulo-Congonhas Airport, SP (CGH/SBSP), Brésil |
During the landing run on a wet runway 35L at Congonhas Airport, the aircraft aquaplaned. The pilot decided to veer to the runway intersection. Unable to decelerate, the aircraft ran down a 5 meter embankment and went through a fence. It hit a barbecue stand, destroying it and slightly injuring the vendor. The aircraft suffered serious damage to its wings.
Probable Cause:
Contributing factors
a. Human Factor
(1) Physiological - Did not contribute.
(2) Psychological - Contributed
By the presence, as a contributing factor, of the perceptive aspects, the decision making and the overconfidence of the crew; and as suspected aspects, the complacency and attention.
b. Material Factor
Did not contribute.
c. Operational Factor
(1) Adverse Weather Conditions - Contributed
The rain that fell over Congonhas, moments before the accident, contributed to the occurrence of aquaplaning due to the high speed of the aircraft, culminating with the loss of control on the ground.
(2) Poor Cabin Coordination - Contributed
The lack of assertiveness of the co-pilot in not commanding the flight or taking commands when checking that the aircraft was outside the appropriate parameters for landing in the existing conditions.
(3) Weak Judgment - Contributed
For not performing a go around as a solution to the mistakes and failures committed during the approach, among which we can mention the excessively high descent gradient, the excessive speed, the non perception of hydroplaning and the cutting of the right engine.
(4) Deficient Planning - Contributed
Even informed that the runway was wet, the crew members did not outline any reaction in order to replan the procedures to be followed, adapting them to the new landing conditions, especially with regard to possible aquaplaning.
(5) Little experience in the aircraft - contributed
The pilot's limited experience in the aircraft influenced the mistakes made on the final approach and landing.
(6) Poor Oversight - Contrived
The company allowed a pilot without an employment relationship and without an adequate adaptation to the aircraft to exercise the function of pilot, which influenced the errors made during landing
Accident investigation:
 |
|
Sources:
» Departamento de Aviação Civil (DAC)Photos
Plan
Ce plan montre l'aéroport de départ ainsi que la supposée destination du vol. La ligne fixe reliant les deux aéroports n'est pas le plan de vol exact.
La distance entre Morrinhos Airport, GO et São Paulo-Congonhas Airport, SP est de 698 km (436 miles).
La distance entre Morrinhos Airport, GO et São Paulo-Congonhas Airport, SP est de 698 km (436 miles).
Les informations ci-dessus ne représentent pas l'opinion de la 'Flight Safety Foundation' ou de 'Aviation Safety Network' sur les causes de l'accident. Ces informations prélimimaires sont basées sur les faits tel qu'ils sont connus à ce jour.
