Narrative:A Saudi Arabian Airlines MD-90 was substantially damaged during a runway excursion accident Riyadh (RUH). The seven crew members escaped unhurt.
The airplane operated on a repositioning flight from Jeddah. During the flight, the captain discussed the use of manual spoilers during landing with the first officer. He further stated that; as he "had only around 400 hours in the aircraft" as a captain, he wanted to "see the effect' of landing with manual spoilers. He further explained that the flight provided an opportunity to "do it manually" (use manual spoilers) as it was a repositioning flight and, the weather and dry runway conditions were ideal. As such, he discussed the procedure with the first officer and elected to land with the auto ground spoiler system unarmed.
The flight was uneventful. During the approach to Riyadh the Landing Checklist was completed, which included the arming of the auto ground spoiler system for landing. After the Landing Checklist was completed, the captain disarmed the auto ground spoiler system with the intention of applying manual ground spoilers after landing. The auto braking system was also not armed prior to landing.
The final approach and touchdown to runway 15 Left at Riyadh were uneventful. The touchdown airspeed was 135 knots calibrated air speed (CAS).
On touchdown, the captain manually extended the spoiler/speed brake lever, but did not latch it in the fully extended (EXT) position (fully aft and latched upwards). The captain then removed his right hand from the speed brake lever in order to deploy the thrust reversers. The first officer noted the movement of the spoiler/speed brake lever and called "Spoilers Deployed".
Since the spoiler/speed brake lever was not fully pulled aft and latched upwards, the lever automatically returned to the forward retracted (RET) position. This movement of the spoiler/speed brake lever was not noticed by the captain and the first officer. In response, the ground spoilers re-stowed before being fully deployed and, a speed brake/flap configuration (SPD BRK/FLP CONFIG) Level 1 Amber Alert occurred. This alert occurred as the aircraft was not yet fully weight on wheels (WOW) and the aircraft still sensed a flight condition with speed brakes deployed and flaps extended beyond six degrees.
Six seconds after touchdown on the right main landing gear, the nose gear touched down and the aircraft transferred to a ground condition (WOW on nose gear and main wheel spin up). The SPD BRK/FLP CONFIG alert extinguished when the nose gear oleo actuated ground shift on landing.
After touchdown, the aircraft banked to the right and began to drift right of the runway centerline. In response, he applied left rudder, deployed the thrust reversers and applied left aileron.
But this did not have any noticeable effect.
The captain saw the approaching G4 taxiway exit and in an attempt to keep the aircraft from leaving the runway surface beyond the G4 taxiway exit, he decided to direct the aircraft towards the taxiway. He then applied a right rudder input which caused the aircraft to commence a rapid sweeping turn to the right towards the G4 taxiway exit.
The aircraft left the runway at high speed, traversed the full width of the G4 taxiway, and exited the surface at its southern edge. The aircraft then entered a sand section and travelled the distance infield between the edge of the G4 taxiway and the adjacent section of taxiway GOLF. The left main landing gear collapsed during this time. The aircraft came to rest on taxiway GOLF.
There was no post impact fire.
Probable Cause:
Cause Related Findings
1. The Captain decided to land with manual ground spoilers when the auto ground spoiler system was fully operational.
2. The initiative by the Captain to conduct this improvised exercise contravened the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and the Flight Operations Policy Manual (FOPM).
3. The auto ground spoiler system was disarmed prior to landing.
4. The spoiler/speed brake lever was partially applied manually after landing.
5. The spoiler/speed brake lever was released before it was fully extended and latched.
6. The spoiler/speed brake lever automatically retracted as per design.
7. The ground spoilers never fully deployed.
8. The loss of lift and aircraft deceleration were greatly reduced by the lack of ground spoiler deployment.
9. Brakes were not used in an attempt to control or slowdown the aircraft.
10. The Captain applied a large right rudder input with the intention of directing the aircraft onto the G4 taxiway exit.
11. The aircraft exited the runway at high speed and was travelling too fast to successfully negotiate the right turn onto the G4 taxiway.
Classification:
Runway excursion (veer-off)
Sources:
» Accident Report Saudi Arabian Airlines - Flight SVA 9061 MD 90-30, Registration HZ-APW King Khaled International Airport - Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia / GACA
Follow-up / safety actions
GACA issued 8 Safety Recommendations
Issued: -- | To: Saudi Arabian Airlines | HZ-APW (1) |
The Operator shall review its initial and recurrent flight simulator training syllabus and flight simulator training procedures to ensure that the procedures for manual deployment of the ground spoilers are covered thoroughly. |
Issued: -- | To: Saudi Arabian Airlines | HZ-APW (2) |
The Operator shall issue a Flight Crew Bulletin (FCB) reminding flight crews to comply with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and the Flight Operations Policy Manual (FOPM); in particular, regarding the Crewmember Rules of Conduct and the Flight Crew Responsibilities. |
Issued: -- | To: Saudi Arabian Airlines | HZ-APW (3) |
The Operator shall include in Chapter 12 (Emergency Procedures) of the FOPM, at the top of page 12.01.01 a warning to read as follows: For purposes other than flight tests, practice of abnormal/emergency procedures shall be conducted solely in a flight simulator. |
Issued: -- | To: Saudi Arabian Airlines | HZ-APW (4) |
The Operator shall include in its training procedures an explanation regarding the design criteria of normal and rapid taxiway exits in accordance with ICAO Annex 14/GACA Section 14. |
Issued: -- | To: Saudi Arabian Airlines | HZ-APW (5) |
The Operator shall amend Chapter 6 (Flight Operations Procedures) of the FOPM, on page 06.03.41, Article TAXI-IN paragraph A as follows: After landing, unless otherwise instructed, pilots must clear the active runway without delay and at a safe speed and, taxi to hold short of the first intersecting taxiway until authorized by ATC to proceed further. |
Issued: -- | To: GACA | HZ-APW (6) |
The GACA shall indicate in its Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) Volume 2, for the King Khaled International Airport Riyadh (KKIA), that none of the taxiways meet the high speed criteria as per paragraph 3.9.16 of ICAO Annex 14/GACA Section 14. |
Issued: -- | To: Saudi Arabian Airlines | HZ-APW (7) |
The Operator shall ensure continuous compliance with the specific requirements of ICAO Annex 6, Part I, Article 6.3.12 and its Attachment, thus recommending annual inspections of CVR and FDR systems. |
Issued: -- | To: GACA | HZ-APW (8) |
The GACA shall ensure compliance by all operators registered in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with Recommendation 4.5 above; and this, through continuous monitoring of CVRs and FDRs. |
Show all...
Photos

accident date:
08-05-2009type: McDonnell Douglas MD-90-30
registration: HZ-APW
Video, social media
Map
This map shows the airport of departure and the intended destination of the flight. The line between the airports does
not display the exact flight path.
Distance from Jeddah-King Abdulaziz International Airport to Riyadh-King Khalid International Airport as the crow flies is 847 km (529 miles).
Accident location: Exact; deduced from official accident report.
This information is not presented as the Flight Safety Foundation or the Aviation Safety Network’s opinion as to the cause of the accident. It is preliminary and is based on the facts as they are known at this time.