ASN logo
Last updated: 16 December 2019
Estado:Final
Fecha:martes 29 enero 2013
Hora:13:10
Tipo:Silhouette image of generic CRJ2 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different
Canadair CL-600-2B19 Regional Jet CRJ-200ER
Operador:SCAT
Registración: UP-CJ006
Numéro de série: 7413
Año de Construcción: 2000
Horas Totales de la Célula:25707
Ciclos:22975
Motores: 2 General Electric CF34-3B1
Tripulación:Fatalidades: 5 / Ocupantes: 5
Pasajeros:Fatalidades: 16 / Ocupantes: 16
Total:Fatalidades: 21 / Ocupantes: 21
Daños en la Aeronave: Destruido
Consecuencias: Written off (damaged beyond repair)
Ubicación:1,6 km (1 milles) NE of Almaty Airport (ALA) (   Kazajstán)
Fase: Aproximación (APR)
Naturaleza:Vuelo Doméstico Programado
Aeropuerto de Salida:Kokshetau Airport (KOV/UACK), Kazajstán
Aeropuerto de Llegada:Almaty Airport (ALA/UAAA), Kazajstán
Número de Vuelo:DV760
Descripción:
A Canadair CRJ-200 operated by SCAT was destroyed in an accident near Almaty Airport (ALA), Kazakhstan, killing all 16 passengers and five crew members. Flight DV760 operated on a domestic flight from Kokshetau Airport (KOV) to Almaty (ALA).
Weather forecast obtained by the crew before departure showed a visibility of 800 m at Almaty with a vertical visibility of 90 m, and temporary reduced visibility to 200 meters. The flight took off at 11:19 hours local time. The captain was Pilot Flying.
At 12:00 the flight contacted Almaty Control and received the current weather conditions which showed a limited visibility for runway 23R of 200 m. At 12:40 the flight was cleared to descend to FL80. By then visibility had decreased to 175 m. The captain decided to continue descent and prepare for an approach to decision height. The captain became increasingly stressed by the poor weather conditions. After reaching FL80 the crew were told to remain at that altitude because of another flight in the area.
This provoked a strong emotional reaction from the captain.
At 12:57 the flight was then cleared down to 1600 m. During the descent the lack of improvement of weather conditions caused a greater and greater irritation on the part of the captain. When turning to finals the runway visual range (RVR) for the first, mid and last part of runway 23R was reported as 275-250-225 m in freezing fog with a vertical visibility of 40 meters. With continuing visibility updates the flight crew kept descending until it was clear that a landing was impossible given the lack of visual contact with the ground.
A missed approach was initiated at 13:10 from a height of 180 m. The autopilot was disconnected and the TO/GA button was pushed. Engine power increased and the flaps were raised to 8°. In the four seconds after pressing to TO/GA button there were no control inputs. Then the captain pushed the control column forward, causing the aircraft to descend. The EGPWS warning sounded as the pitch changed to -9. The observer pilot tried to draw attention on the EGPWS warning but there was no response on the controls by the flight crew. Pitch angle further increased to -16° and vertical speed was -20 to -30 m/sec. The aircraft impacted the ground at high speed and a -20° pitch angle and broke up.

Probable Cause:

CONCLUSION: (translated from Russian):
The accident with aircraft CRJ-200 UP-CJ006 occurred during the execution of a go-around, in instrument meteorological conditions, without the possibility of visual contact with ground reference points (vertical visibility in the fog did not exceed 40 m), the necessity of which was caused by the mismatch between the actual weather conditions and the minimum conditions for which the crew was certified to land. As a result, the deflection of the elevator towards a dive of the aircraft caused a descent and collision with the ground. It was not possible to uniquely identify the causes of the aircraft's transfer to a dive from the available data. The Commission did not find evidence of failures of aviation equipment, as well as external to the aircraft (icing, wind shear, wake turbulence) when trying to perform a go-around.
The most likely factors that led to the accident, were:
- partial loss performance of the pilot in command, which at the time of aircraft impact with the ground was not in a working position;
- the lack of CRM levels in the crew, and violation of the Fly-Navigate-Communicate principle, which manifested itself in diverting attention by the co-pilot to conduct external radio communication and lack of control of the flight instrument parameters;
- the lack of response to the EGPWS and the actions required;
- the impact somatographic illusions of perception of the pitch angle (a nose-up illusion);
- increased emotional stress by the crew members associated with the unjustified expectations of improved weather conditions at the time of landing;
- failure to comply with the requirements for health examination of flight personnel, which led to the pilot in command flying without the rehabilitation period and without assessment of his health status after undergoing surgery.

Accident investigation:
cover
Investigating agency: MAK
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 2 years and 1 months
Accident number: Final report
Download report: Final report

Fuentes:
» Interfax
» Prosecutor General's office of Republic of Kazakhstan
» Ministry of Transport

METAR Weather report:
07:00 UTC / 13:00 local time:
UAAA 290700Z 05001MPS 0150 R23R/0150N R23L/0200N FZFG VV001 M01/M01 Q1019 882/0150 NOSIG RMK QBB040
Wind 050 degrees at 1 m/sec (2 knots); Visibility: 150 m; Runway Visual Range of runway 23R: 150 m, and 200 m at runway 23L; Freezing fog; Temperature: -1°C; Dewpoint: -1°C; Pressure: 1019 mb.

07:30 UTC / 13:30 local time:
UAAA 290730Z 02001MPS 0150 R23R/0150N R23L/0200N FZFG VV001 M01/M01 Q1018 882/0150 NOSIG RMK QBB040


Fotos

photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-UP-CJ006
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: UP-CJ006
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-OY-RJA
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: OY-RJA
photo of Canadair-CRJ-200ER-OY-RJA
accident date: 29-01-2013
type: Canadair CRJ-200ER
registration: OY-RJA
 

Aircraft history
date registration operator remarks
MAY 2000 C-FMLV Bombardier first flight
11 JUL 2000 OY-RJA Cimber Air delivered
07 JAN 2009 OY-RJA Cimber Sterling new name after acquiring Sterling Airlines
20 SEP 2012 UP-CJ006 SCAT delivered

Map
This map shows the airport of departure and the intended destination of the flight. The line between the airports does not display the exact flight path.
Distance from Kokshetau Airport to Almaty Airport as the crow flies is 1228 km (767 miles).
Accident location: Exact; deduced from official accident report.

This information is not presented as the Flight Safety Foundation or the Aviation Safety Network’s opinion as to the cause of the accident. It is preliminary and is based on the facts as they are known at this time.
languages: languages

Share

CRJ100

  • 1054+ built
  • 16th loss
  • 9th accidente fatal
  • 4th worst accident
» safety profile

 Kazajstán
  • 11th worst accident
» safety profile