ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 210446
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.
| Date: | Friday 16 May 1997 |
| Time: | 07:42 |
| Type: |  Saab 340B |
| Owner/operator: | Hazelton Airlines |
| Registration: | VH-OLM |
| MSN: | 340B-205 |
| Fatalities: | Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: |
| Aircraft damage: | Minor |
| Location: | near Bindook, NSW -
 Australia
|
| Phase: | En route |
| Nature: | Passenger - Scheduled |
| Departure airport: | YSDU |
| YSSY | |
| Investigating agency: | BASI |
| Confidence Rating: |  Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
Whilst approaching Bindook at FL180, on a scheduled air transport flight from Dubbo to Sydney, the crew of a SAAB 340B observed the right engine air intake caution light illuminate. The abnormal procedures checklist for this condition was carried out and the caution light extinguished. A short time later a strong burning smell became evident on the flight deck. However, there were no associated warning indications. Discussions with the flight attendant revealed that the smell was isolated to the cockpit, indicating that the burning smell may have been associated with the right air conditioning system, which supplied conditioned air to the cockpit. The 'Air Conditioning Smoke' emergency checklist was not utilised. The right engine bleed air valve was closed in an attempt to further diagnose the problem. Several minutes later the bleed air valve was reopened. The burning smell in the cockpit intensified. Reports from the flight attendant continued to indicate no noticeable smell in the cabin. The co-pilot then looked out the right, side window and reported to the pilot in command that there was a fire in the right engine. There were no fire warning indications in the cockpit. The engine fire checklist was carried out, the right engine fire bottle was discharged, and the engine shut down. An inflight emergency was declared to Air Traffic Control, who initiated a distress phase and expedited the entry of the aircraft to Sydney. All three crewmembers then prepared for an emergency landing at Sydney. The pilot in command advised the flight attendant that the landing would be normal, and would be followed by a normal disembarkation on an adjacent taxiway. With local emergency services in attendance, the aircraft subsequently landed safely on runway 07 and was stopped on taxiway G3. All occupants disembarked normally through the main cabin door and were transported to the terminal. An engineering examination revealed that the right engine lower intake anti-ice duct had short-circuited and was excessively burnt around the inner-upper lip at the particle separator mounting flange. The damage was consistent with the duct material smouldering for some time. Based on the recollection of the co-pilot, there had been no visible flames but rather a very bright red/orange glow inside the intake. The lower duct, and the particle separator, were replaced with serviceable items and the aircraft returned to service. The engine intake anti-ice system consists of electrically heated intake ducts. The heater elements are made of a copper alloy material sprayed onto a glass fibre mat and covered with an outer glass mat. The mat is bonded to the metal inlet, making them an integral unit. Should the duct intake surface suffer damage which allows moisture to penetrate to the heater elements, short-circuits can occur. Although required as part of the engine fire emergency checklist, the activation of the fire extinguisher has no effect on the engine intake duct. The intake duct anti-ice remote circuit breaker is designed to trip as a result of a short-circuit. In this case the circuit-breaker failed to trip. The aircraft manufacturer has been aware of short-circuiting intake duct heaters in aircraft equipped with this particular type of intake, and had developed a specific checklist titled 'Intake Sparks' to cover this particular situation. At the time of this occurrence the checklist was being distributed as an amendment to the Aircraft Operations Manual, but had not been available to the flight crew. Local safety action. As a result of this occurrence the company has introduced improvements to flight operations training and procedures, designed to assist flight crews in the recognition and handling of intake duct problems. In addition, both flight and cabin crew emergency disembarkation procedures are being reviewed. Other safety actions include increasing the frequency of engineering inspections and resurfacing of duct heater elements, as well as streamlining procedures to ensure new information from the aircraft manufacturer is distributed to all crews without delay.
Sources:
https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/1997/aair/199701563/
https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/4930847/199701563.pdf
Accident investigation:
 |
|
Other occurrences involving this aircraft
| 28 June 2002 | VH-OLM | Hazelton Airlines | 0 | 7 km ESE of Bathurst, NSW | |
non |
| 9 January 2015 | VH-OLM | Rex Airlines | 0 | Moruya Airport, NSW (MYA/YMRY) | |
min |
| Bird strike | ||||||
Revision history:
| Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
|---|---|---|
| 05-May-2018 12:16 | Pineapple | Added |
Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description
The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:
| ASN Home | Send Correction / Feedback |
| FSF Home | Disclaimer | Copyright |
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy |
| Press / Media |
CONNECT WITH US:
©2023 Flight Safety Foundation