Accident Cessna U206G Stationair 6 II VH-MZL, Wednesday 7 June 2023
ASN logo
 

Date:Wednesday 7 June 2023
Time:15:10
Type:Silhouette image of generic C206 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
Cessna U206G Stationair 6 II
Owner/operator:Strickland Bosavi Foundation Ltd
Registration: VH-MZL
MSN: U20606661
Year of manufacture:1982
Engine model:Continental IO-520-F17B
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 3
Other fatalities:0
Aircraft damage: Substantial
Category:Accident
Location:Dodomona Airstrip -   Papua New Guinea
Phase: Take off
Nature:Private
Departure airport:Dodomona Airstrip
Destination airport:Mougulu Airstrip
Investigating agency: AIC PNG
Confidence Rating: Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Narrative:
The Cessna 206 aircraft, registered VH-MZL, was conducting a Private VFR flight from Dodomona Airstrip to Mougulu Airstrip, Western Province, Papua New Guinea, when during take-off roll, the aircraft ran off the edge of the runway and overturned into the sloping terrain.

CAUSES [CONTRIBUTING FACTORS]
The runway excursion accident was primarily caused by the pilot’s nominated Acceleration Check Point (ACP) just 5 m before an undulation, and the pilot's lack of situational awareness regarding prevailing wind and surface conditions. The ACP, nominated about a third of the runway length at Dodomona, was intended to assess the aircraft's acceleration. However, upon reaching the ACP and observing lower-than-expected acceleration, the pilot decided to abort take-off. The unexpected airborne event, caused by the undulation immediately after the ACP and high groundspeed due to tailwind resulted in the aircraft losing approximately 70 meters of runway critical for deceleration.

Further contributing to the accident was the pilot's misunderstanding of the prevailing wind conditions.
Despite perceiving the wind to be varying between 5-8 knots, the actual wind during take-off was stronger than anticipated. The pilot's reliance on a limp, unserviceable windsock, and failure to use nearby trees and grass to assess wind conditions, led to incorrect judgment. This lack of awareness about wind conditions significantly impacted the pilot's decision-making during the take-off roll.
Surface conditions also played a critical role in the accident. While the initial line-up and take-off area was dry and hard, the runway beyond the undulation was softer and more slippery, limiting brake effectiveness. With approximately 270 meters of runway remaining after the aircraft's wheels touched the ground again, the limited traction hindered deceleration efforts. The pilot's selection of an ACP without also choosing a Safe Abort Point (SAP) according to the Operator’s Standard Operating Procedures further exacerbated the situation, resulting in the runway excursion.

Accident investigation:
cover
  
Investigating agency: AIC PNG
Report number: AIC 23-1004
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 1 year and 3 months
Download report: Final report

Sources:

https://www.aic.gov.pg/news
https://www.casa.gov.au/search-centre/aircraft-register?search_api_fulltext=MZL



https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/5/15316_1591658675.jpg (photo)

History of this aircraft

Ex P2-MAE, P2-HBP, N9787Z

Revision history:

Date/timeContributorUpdates
13-Jun-2023 06:01 harro Added
13-Jun-2023 08:53 RobertMB Updated
13-Jun-2023 14:29 Captain Adam Updated
29-Jun-2023 06:12 harro Updated
06-Sep-2024 16:57 ASN Updated [Accident report, ]
06-Sep-2024 17:15 ASN Updated [Nature, Narrative, ]

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2025 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org