| Date: | Sunday 25 September 2022 |
| Time: | 21:13 |
| Type: | Boeing 737-8V3 (WL) |
| Owner/operator: | Copa Airlines |
| Registration: | HP-1539CMP |
| MSN: | 29667/3151 |
| Year of manufacture: | 2010 |
| Total airframe hrs: | 41663 hours |
| Cycles: | 14331 flights |
| Engine model: | CFMI CFM56-7B26 |
| Fatalities: | Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 159 |
| Other fatalities: | 0 |
| Aircraft damage: | Substantial, repaired |
| Category: | Accident |
| Location: | Panama City-Tocumen International Airport (PTY) -
Panama
|
| Phase: | Landing |
| Nature: | Passenger - Scheduled |
| Departure airport: | Mexico City-Benito Juárez International Airport (MEX/MMMX) |
| Destination airport: | Panama City-Tocumen International Airport (PTY/MPTO) |
| Investigating agency: | OFINVAA |
| Confidence Rating: | Information verified through data from accident investigation authorities |
Narrative:Copa Airlines flight 135, a Boeing 737-800, veered off the left side of runway 03R while landing at Panama City-Tocumen International Airport.
Before starting the approach the crew carried out a Forward threat briefing, highlighting that the reverser of engine no.2 was inoperative per MEL. In case the runway was wet and in case of an asymmetry they would not use the engine no.1 reverse.
At the moment of touchdown the crew felt a vibration as if a wheel was deflated, with a strong yaw to the left. They proceeded to apply full rudder to the right to direct the aircraft towards the runway centreline and activated the reverse of engine no.1 to slow the aircraft without success. Perceiving that the yaw moment was increasing and following the procedures, the pilot kept the reverse and continued applying full deflection on the right pedal to return the aircraft to the runway centreline without success.
The aircraft went off the side of the runway and stopped. The crew analyzed the situation perceiving a strong smell of burning. The nose gear was collapsed and to avoid possible further damage they decided to shut down the engines, and verified that there was no indication of OVERHEAT or FIRE, proceeded to start the APU to have an alternate power source. An evacuation was carried out without incidents or reports of any person with any injury.
Probable Cause(s)
Throughout the investigation, it was determined that the accident was a result of the following probable causes:
- The weather conditions at Tocumen International Airport at the time of the accident, during the approach to runway 03R, included a night with significant cloud cover, winds at 110 degrees at 11KT, visibility at 6000 in thunderstorms with rain, scattered clouds at 700 feet, scattered cumulonimbus at 1600 feet, overcast at 8000 feet, a temperature of 25°C, and pressure at 1090 hPa.
- Operational failure in handling the emergency that occurred, as the landing was recorded with engine power above idle on both engines. The reverse thrust on engine 1 was immediately engaged and accelerated to a value of 84% N1, while N2 on the same engine remained at 41%. The speed brakes and the automatic brake system did not activate.
- The surface of runway 03R does not meet the load-bearing capacity required for aircraft that, for any reason, experience runway excursions during landing or takeoff. See appendix 4.
Contributing Factors
- The weather conditions at Tocumen International Airport, with light to moderate rain over the first 2000 feet of runway 03R.
- Loss of control of the aircraft after landing, leading to a runway excursion due to:
-- Shifts in wind direction during the final seconds before landing.
-- Light to moderate rain over the first 2,000 feet of runway 03R.
-- Loss of situational awareness.
-- Incorrect perception by the pilots, who believed they had gone off the runway due to a flat tire.
-- Lack of specific training for landing with inoperative reverse thrust and under marginal conditions.
-- The First Officer’s call of “Speed Brake Up” and incorrect verification of the brake lever movement.
-- Failure to manually activate the speed brakes and brakes.
-- The reverse thrust on engine N1 was not disengaged and was maintained at maximum power after the aircraft began to veer left of the runway centerline.
METAR:
02:00 UTC / 21:00 local time:
MPTO 260200Z 01003KT 9999 SCT017CB SCT090 26/24 Q1009 NOSIG
02:13 UTC / 21:13 local time:
MPTO 260213Z 11011KT 6000 TSRA SCT007 SCT016CB BKN080 25/24 Q1009 TEMPO 7000
03:00 UTC / 22:00 local time:
MPTO 260300Z 29008KT 8000 TSRA SCT007 SCT015CB BKN080 25/23 Q1009 TEMPO 6000
Accident investigation:
|
|
| | |
| Investigating agency: | OFINVAA |
| Report number: | ACCID-010 HP-1539CMP-2022 |
| Status: | Investigation completed |
| Duration: | 12 months |
| Download report: | Final report
|
|
Sources:
OFINVAA
Location
Revision history:
| Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
| 31-Oct-2024 09:48 |
ASN |
Updated [Source, Narrative, Accident report, ] |