ASN logo
ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 22155
Last updated: 20 September 2021
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information. If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.

Type:Silhouette image of generic whtl model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different
Armstrong Whitworth Whitley Mk V
Owner/operator:77 Sqn RAF
Registration: N1368
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 5
Other fatalities:0
Aircraft damage: Written off (damaged beyond repair)
Location:RAF Driffield, Yorkshire, England -   United Kingdom
Phase: Landing
Departure airport:
Destination airport:RAF Driffield
On 2 April 1940 the Whitley V N1368 KN-K of 77 Sqn RAF overshot on landing at Driffield airfield at 22.40hrs following a low level bombing practice. It ran through the boundary fence after the pilot attempted to apply the brakes on wet grass, this did not stop the aircraft in time. The aircraft skidded through boundary fence, across a road and into a field. It was recovered by 60 MU on 3rd April but was deemed beyond repair and written off. The aircraft was being flown by a 102 Squadron crew at the time of this accident.

The crew information detailed below was found on the internet and has yet to be confirmed by viewing the ORB:
Plt Off Kenneth N Gray DFC, Czech War Cross (pilot, RAF (40342), of Christchurch, New Zealand)
Sgt John H Hopper (pilot, RAF (518878), of Doncaster, Yorkshire)
Sgt Frederick J Bass (observer, RAF (580902), of Muswell Hill, London)
AC1 Alfred W Henry Hart (wireless operator, RAF (632176), of Richmond, Surrey)
AC2 George Main (air gunner, RAF (632772))

Whitley N1368 was built to contract 75147/38 by Armstrong Whitworth Ltd. at Baginton and delivered to 102 Squadron at Driffield in September 1939. On an unspecified date it transferred to 77 Squadron also based at Driffield. Following the mishap above Cat. W/FA damaged was recorded after it was inspected by 60 MU the following day. It was struck off charge and it is believed to have become a ground instructional airframe, but its new identity is not yet known.


Revision history:

04-Aug-2008 09:55 Anon. Added
09-May-2013 07:35 Nepa Updated [Aircraft type, Operator, Location, Destination airport, Narrative]
19-Jul-2017 09:58 Laurent Rizzotti Updated [Time, Location, Source, Damage, Narrative]

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description