ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 65432
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can
submit corrected information.
Date: | Sunday 7 June 2009 |
Time: | 17:45 |
Type: | Gulfstream American AA-5B Tiger |
Owner/operator: | Private |
Registration: | N448DM |
MSN: | AA5B-0976 |
Total airframe hrs: | 1110 hours |
Engine model: | Lycoming O-360-A4K |
Fatalities: | Fatalities: 2 / Occupants: 2 |
Aircraft damage: | Substantial |
Category: | Accident |
Location: | Black River Falls, near Humbird, Wisconsin -
United States of America
|
Phase: | En route |
Nature: | Private |
Departure airport: | Lake Elmo, MN (21D) |
Destination airport: | Sheboygan, WI (KSBM) |
Investigating agency: | NTSB |
Confidence Rating: | Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
Narrative:The non-instrument-rated private pilot obtained two weather briefings before departing on the visual flight rules (VFR) cross-country flight. During the weather briefings he was advised that VFR flight was not recommended because of an active weather advisory for widespread instrument meteorological conditions that encompassed his planned route. The weather advisory was for occasional cloud ceilings below 1,000 feet above ground level (agl) and surface visibilities less than 3 miles with light precipitation/mist. The forecast weather was for ceilings 1,500 to 2,500 feet agl with widely scattered light rain showers and isolated thunderstorms. Approximately 1 hour after departure, several witnesses located near the accident site reported hearing an airplane overfly their position. These witnesses noted that because of a low cloud ceiling, fog, and light precipitation they could not see the airplane. The witnesses reported hearing the sound of an airplane engine operating at a high speed. Several witnesses noted that the loudness of the airplane's engine increased and decreased several times, as if the airplane was turning, before they heard a ground impact. The distribution of the wreckage was consistent with an airplane that experienced a loss of control and an in-flight breakup at low altitude and high airspeed. The challenging visibility conditions were conducive to the onset of pilot spatial disorientation and the airplane's rapid, near-vertical descent is consistent with the pilot's loss of control of the airplane because of spatial disorientation. The postaccident investigation revealed no preexisting mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have prevented the normal operation of the airplane or its systems.
Probable Cause: The pilot's decision to attempt a visual flight rules flight into an area of known instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in a loss of control due to spatial disorientation.
Accident investigation:
|
| |
Investigating agency: | NTSB |
Report number: | CEN09FA340 |
Status: | Investigation completed |
Duration: | 2 years 1 month |
Download report: | Final report |
|
Sources:
NTSB
FAA register: 2. FAA:
http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?omni=Home-N-Number&nNumberTxt=448DM Location
Revision history:
Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
08-Jun-2009 07:17 |
slowkid |
Added |
10-Aug-2016 23:17 |
Dr.John Smith |
Updated [Time, Cn, Operator, Location, Phase, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Damage, Narrative] |
21-Dec-2016 19:25 |
ASN Update Bot |
Updated [Time, Damage, Category, Investigating agency] |
02-Dec-2017 15:38 |
ASN Update Bot |
Updated [Cn, Other fatalities, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Narrative] |
The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
CONNECT WITH US:
©2024 Flight Safety Foundation